Slope of Hope Blog Posts

Slope initially began as a blog, so this is where most of the website’s content resides. Here we have tens of thousands of posts dating back over a decade. These are listed in reverse chronological order. Click on any category icon below to see posts tagged with that particular subject, or click on a word in the category cloud on the right side of the screen for more specific choices.

When Will the Analog Terminate?

By -

One of the very few unpleasant aspects of doing a widely-read blog is that, from time to time, I get a nasty email. Here's one I got yesterday:

from Mark Everett <[email protected]>

to [email protected]

date Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:10 PM

subject 1937-42 Scenario

Tim,

You're a naive idiot if you think the market is going to exactly repeat the 1937-42 pattern, and the way you've "counted out" the moves and presented them in your blog says you're basically expecting an exact repeat. This just shows that you're an example of how moronic most traders are nowadays, looking for a pattern on a historical chart and lining it up with today's chart and saying "that's the future." I'm as bearish as anyone and have been for over 10 years, but the "Big Picture" section of your website is idiocy and show that you could use a class in logic.

Mark Everett

I guess I should be flattered that Mark took the time to create a new email address just to send me a nasty note (this is a common practice among trolls), but this does raise a point I've been meaning to make about the analog.

I've been very vocal about the 1937-1942 analog, but some might wonder what happens when "1942" is here (e.g., the bottom, which I imagine is going to be somewhere between 600 and 650 on the S&P).

The short answer is: we'll be in a different market then, and I have no idea what will be next. I consider the analog to be useful for this bear market; after it's done, I'll have to think hard about what to do next.

Because the general outline of the analog has held up so well, I'm keeping my faith in it until it is completely broken (which might never come; we might make it all the way to the terminus of the analog without missing a beat).

I have, along the way, been updating my Big Picture page, and I've kept all the "amendments" in there, which includes plenty of misfires. But The Vision has kept its course beautifully, and I am looking forward to the next big move down.

Zooming Into the Analog

By -

Over the weekend, I printed out a bunch of charts and checked in with my 1937-1942 analog. It seems to be playing out as beautifully as ever. I'll share a couple of the charts here. This is a close-up of the period in the late 1930s that I am following:

0809-past

For me, 2010 is all about the move from "L" to "M". I don't know if we are at "L" yet – – it could be as high as 1170 on the /ES, which is nearly 50 points higher from current levels – – so there's plenty of room for the bulls to run before this analog is invalidated.

Below I've tinted in cyan the range where "L" may terminate. Because I don't know when it will happen, I am keeping stops very wide. Once we start falling, I'm going to hang on tight until about 925 on the S&P, at which time I will cover everything.

0809-present

Waiting for "L" is a drag, but no one is going to ring a bell an announce a nearly 20% drop is about to take place. I want to be ready for it when (OK, if and when) it comes.

WAGnostic Update

By -

So I took a look at Tim’s 1937 WAG corollary in my DIY
charting program (i.e. Excel).  Peak-to-peak,
mapping every active trading day 1:1, the two datasets are 86.4% correlated
through yesterday:

 
WAG_1
So while correlated is nice, it’s not like people are using
this to predict future behavior or anything. 
However, even an untrained eye can see some amount of “shadowing,” where
the patterns appear very similar- but on different time scales.

So I started playing with the time scales and came across
two WAG scenarios:

1)     
Peak-valley mapping on both: Puts us on the RS and
about to downhill the K-12 like Lane Meyer. 
Today certainly appears to be supporting this run (at least while I was
writing this… the PPT Bat-Phone might not have been called yet).

 
WAG_2
2)     
Peak2-to-peak2 mapped: is interesting in that we’re
not yet to the H&S neckline (more like “on” the neck with a shoulder to go)

 
WAG_3
If anyone can think of a more scientific approach to
evaluating this time-compression hypothesis, I’d be interested to hear it.